Did it make
the right call?
Compare the agent’s outcome with an independently defined expectation. Surface unsafe approvals and missed escalations.
The independent assurance layer for AI in financial crime.
Know what your agents get right. Find what they miss.
Independent evaluation for the moments that matter: a case approved, a risk escalated, an explanation challenged. Start with KYC and EDD. Make every finding traceable.
See assurance in actionA confident answer is a starting point.
An independently tested decision is something else.
“The shareholder loan supports
the stated source of funds.”
loan_agreement.pdfCompare the agent’s outcome with an independently defined expectation. Surface unsafe approvals and missed escalations.
Check that the required sources are present and references resolve. Make missing evidence a finding, not a footnote.
Keep the case, policy, prompt, and response together. Give reviewers a record they can inspect and a conclusion they can own.
The system making a decision shouldn’t be its only judge. Put an independent standard between the agent’s answer and your approval.
Your workflow. Your policy. A separate layer of scrutiny.
Discuss your workflowStart with the AI-assisted decision you need to trust most.
Define what good looks like, then put it to the test.
Choose a KYC or EDD workflow, its policy, and the person accountable for sign-off.
Agree the cases, expected outcomes, and evidence requirements with your reviewers.
Review the findings, prioritize remediation, and build the case for a controlled rollout.
The interactive demo evaluates 12 synthetic KYC/EDD cases using two simulated AI candidates. You can inspect failed checks, review the source evidence, add notes, and export the results. It does not call a live model.